Stinson v. Edwards et al
| Ryan Joel Edward Stinson |
| Mr. Jerod, Daniel Edwards, Joyce Jackson, Brandon Pinion, Chad Hickey, Joshua Jackson, Eric Andrews and Mrs. Pam |
| 2:2012cv00404 |
| February 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Tangipahoa |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Sarah S. Vance |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 - the plaintiffs motion to compel discovery is DISMISSED as moot. It is further ordered that plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims of excessive force, failure to protect, and denial of medica l care arising from the February 6, 2012, incident against Warden Jackson, Assistant Warden Pinion, Deputy Jackson, Deputy Andrews, Sergeant Ricard, and Deputy Connerson are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/18/13.(jjs, )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36 the defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs claims against Sheriff Daniel Edwards and Sergeant Chad Hickey are DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous. Plaintiffs motion for a writ of mandamus and a temporary restraining order are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/24/12.(jjs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
