Wallis v. Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. et al
| Larian Wallis |
| Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. and Hornbeck Offshore Trinidad and Tobago, L.L.C. |
| 2:2012cv00536 |
| February 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Helen G. Berrigan |
| Alma L. Chasez |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 30104 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law herein, the Court finds that the Plaintiff failed to establish that the alleged accident occurred by a preponderance of the evidence. Accordingly, the Cour t finds that the Defendants Royal Eagle Services, LLC, Hornbeck Offshore Trinidad and Tobago, L.L.C., and Hornbeck Offshore Operators, L.L.C. are entitled to judgment in their favor. The Court will enter a judgment to that effect by separate order. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 12/23/2014.(Reference: 12-536)(bwn)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER AND REASONS denying 84 Motion in Limine; denying 85 Motion in Limine; denying 87 Motion in Limine; denying 88 Motion in Limine; denying 93 Motion in Limine; denying 94 Motion in Limine; denying 96 Motion in Limine; denying 99 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan. (Reference: 12-536)(bwn)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER AND REASONS re 102 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North. (Reference: 12-536)(lag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
