Ebanks v. United States of America et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 28, 2013
ORDER & REASONS that the Plaintiff's 94 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 6/28/13. (dno, )
|May 21, 2013
ORDER & REASONS that Plaintiff's 26 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Plaintiff's Motion is granted insofar as this Court declares that John Ebanks was within the course and scope of his employment at the time of the car accident that caused his death; it is denied insofar as it sought a similar declaration as to Michael Demelio or any other relief. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there be judgment in favor of the Plaintiff as to he r claim for maintenance and cure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant MEBA Medical & Benefits Plan's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff's claims against Defendant MEBA be and are hereb y DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants ASM, Patriot, and the United States' 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the second Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the same Defendants under seal 32 be and is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Defendants' Motion is granted insofar as Plaintiff's claims other than her claim for maintenance and cure be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; it is denied with respect to her claim for maintenance and cure. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 5/21/13.(dno, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?