In Re: Barnett Marine, Inc.
| Barnett Marine Inc |
| 2:2012cv00948 |
| April 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Plaquemines |
| Eldon E. Fallon |
| Sally Shushan |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 0181 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER & REASONS that Barnett Marine's 14 Motion to Dismiss subsequently converted to a motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The claims of Vincent Grillo are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Barnett Marine's 39 Motion to Strike is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 2/15/13. (dno, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: Barnett Marine, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Barnett Marine Inc | |
| Represented By: | Rufus C. Harris, III |
| Represented By: | Cindy Galpin Martin |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Ordoyne |
| Represented By: | Alfred Jackson Rufty, III |
| Represented By: | Jill Schultz Willhoft |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
