Ross v. LeBlanc et al
| Samuel Ross |
| James LeBlanc |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2012cv00973 |
| April 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Caldwell |
| Lance M Africk |
| Louis Moore |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 26 . Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 9/3/14.(jjl)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER & REASONS: Before the Court are Petitioner Samuel Ross's ("Ross") 30 Motion for Re-Hearing and 32 Motion for Extension of Time, wherein he seeks (1) relief from this Court's order and judgment entered on August 15, 2013, dismissing his petition for federal habeas corpus relief with prejudice, and (2) an extension of time to file his objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendations; for the reasons stated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ross's Mot ion for Rehearing is GRANTED and the order, judgment, and denial of certificate of appealability entered on August 15, 2013, are VACATED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ross's Motion for Extension of Time to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ross file any objections to the Report and Recommendation by September 18, 2013. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 9/10/2013.(rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
