Thomas v. Rockin D Marine Services, LLC
| James Thomas |
| Rockin D Marine Services, LLC |
| 2:2012cv01315 |
| May 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Tangipahoa |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Jay C. Zainey |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 0688 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
215
ORDERED that 171 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED as stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 7/5/2013. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
201
ORDERED that 157 Motion to Compel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
183
ORDERED that 119 Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(2) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
169
ORDERED that 96 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Thomas is awarded reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $825.00 against Defendant, Rockin D Marine Services, LLC. Rockin D shall satisfy its obligation to Thomas no later than fourteen 14 days from the issuance of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 5/13/2013. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
168
ORDERED that 117 Motion for Sanctions for Failing to Produce Statements of Co-Workers and 147 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Sanctions for Failing to Produce Statements of Co-Workers are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as stated herein. FURTHER ORDERED that Request for Attorney's Fees as contained in Doc. 117 is GRANTED as stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 5/1/2013. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
164
ORDERED that 148 Motion to Quash Subpoena to a Non-Party is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 4/25/2013. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
143
ORDERED that 113 Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART as stated herein. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff, James Thomas, shall supplement his discovery responses as specified at oral argument no later than 10 days of the issuance of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 4/2/2013. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER granting 66 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (clm, )
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 68 Motion for Reconsideration re 61 Order on Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (clm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Rockin D Marine Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Thomas | |
| Represented By: | Robert Lansden |
| Represented By: | Thomas Massa Discon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rockin D Marine Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence R. Plunkett, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Robert Seth Reich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
