Barrilleaux v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
| Christopher Barrilleaux |
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Sea Support Ventures, LLC |
| 2:2012cv01542 |
| June 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Terrebonne |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
ORDER AND REASONS granting 131 Motion for Leave to File Memorandum in Opposition to Sea Support's MSJ; granting 116 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claim against Sea Support based on a breach of a fiduciary duty to pr ovide him with a copy of the LTD Policy is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court has previously dismissed all of Plaintiff's other claims against Defendants Sea Support and Hartford.14 Accordingly, the Court will issue a final judgment in favor of Sea Support and Hartford dismissing all of Plaintiff's claims with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan. (bwn)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Sea Support's 48 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Sea Support under ERISA and state law for benefits under the LTD Policy are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan. (bwn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
