Richardson et al v Cella et al.
Rachele Cella Richardson and Brandy Cella |
George A Cella, III and New York Life Insurance Company |
2:2012cv01771 |
July 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
St Tammany |
Eldon E. Fallon |
Daniel E. Knowles |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 149 ORDER & REASONS that Defendant's 95 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in RICO Claims; Defendant's 97 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Claims of Brandy Cella on Statute of Limitations Grounds; Defendant's 98 Motion f or Partial Summary Judgment as to Claims of Rachele Richardson on Grounds of Unclean Hands; Plaintiffs' 99 Motion for Adverse Inference AND Plaintiffs' 100 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Conversion are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's 96 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Claims for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 2/26/14. (dno, ) |
Filing 25 ORDER & REASONS that Defendant George A. Cella, III's 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Plaintiffs' claims pursuant to subsections 1962(a) and 1962(b) of RICO and Plaintiffs' Louisiana fraud claim are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiffs' remaining claims survive. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 8/23/13. (dno, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.