Babin v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
| Daniel P Babin |
| New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission |
| 2:2012cv01868 |
| July 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| St James |
| Eldon E. Fallon |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER AND REASONS ON MOTION. For the reasons states herein, Defendant's 62 Motion to Set Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. For the foregoing reasons, Ross Citti, the law firm of Youngdahl & Citti and/orplaintiff must pay defendant $5,088.65 (an amount for which all three are liable in solido; i.e., for the full amount to whatever extent the others fail to pay) to reimburse defendant for reasonable fees and expenses incurred as a result of Citti's conduct. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 10/2/13. (tbl)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER & REASONS that Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED with respect to the issue of whether the locomotive was "in use" at the time of the incident, but DENIED with respect to the issues of whether the LIA was violated and whether the alleged violation caused the Plaintiff's injuries. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 5/1/13. (dno, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
