Slocum v. Devezin et al
| Joy Walker Slocum |
| Armand Devezin, Rosalynne Dennis, Darryl Kilbert and Charlotte Matthew |
| 2:2012cv01915 |
| July 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Alma L. Chasez |
| Employment |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER & REASONS re dfts' 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: for the reasons stated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 8 Motion for Dismissal is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims for religious discrimination under T itle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's requests "to be free from any retaliation from [her] employer as a result of filing this case;" and for her "children [t o be] free of any repercussions as a result of this case, since they are enrolled in schools governed by Orleans Parish School Board, "are DISMISSED, as they are not ripe at this time and therefore Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon whic h relief can be granted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any related state law claims, whether expressly plead in the complaint or not, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, so that Plaintiff may refile such claims in the appropriate state court. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 6/3/2013. (rll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
