United States of America v. New Orleans City
| United States of America |
| New Orleans City |
| Crescent City Lodge No. 2, Fraternal Order of Police, Incorporated, Walter Powers, Jr., Community United for Change, Police Association of New Orleans, Michael Glasser, Office of the Independent Police Monitor and Susan Hutson |
| 2:2012cv01924 |
| July 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Susie Morgan |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
669
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 643 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/8/2023. (pp) (Main Document 669 replaced on 2/9/2023 to correct typo) (tsf).
|
|
Filing
645
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 642 Motion for Leave by the State of Louisiana, Office of the Attorney General to File an Amicus Brief in Support of the City of New Orleans' Motion to Terminate the Consent Decree is DENIED. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 9/26/2022. (pp)
|
|
Filing
260
ORDER AND REASONS denying 165 Motion for relief. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 5/29/13. (cbn)
|
|
Filing
258
ORDER AND REASONS denying 257 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan. (cbn)
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER AND REASONS denying 172 Motion to Stay, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/8/2013. (tsf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
