Walker v. Gusman et al
Plaintiff: Mark Walker
Defendant: Marlin Gusman, Kevin Winfield, Charles Ezeb, Samuel Gore, Charles Higgins, John Doe and Carlos Louque
Case Number: 2:2012cv02521
Filed: October 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: West Feliciana
Presiding Judge: Mary Ann Vial Lemmon
Presiding Judge: Daniel E. Knowles
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 372 ORDERED that Gusman's 363 Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's 365 Motion to Compel Gusman's deposition is GRANTED and that defense counsel provide a date-certain for that deposition in December of 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III on 11/23/2015. (cms)
May 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 341 ORDER AND REASONS granting 320 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Party Michael Laughlin, Curtis Lumar, David Oates, Kevin Talley, Tyrone Williams, Hazel Bowser and Krystal Lacking dismissed; denying 305 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 5/15/15. (cbn)
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 306 ORDER & REASONS re: 294 Motion for Discovery to Reconsider Prior Discovery Rulings and to Reopen Discovery. ORDERED that plaintiff's motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as set forth in document. ORDERED that additional discovery wil l be permitted, but all discovery must be completed no later than 4/20/15 as set forth in document. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court grants reconsideration of its prior discovery rulings in the disputed respects as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III on 1/21/15. (plh) Modified doc type on 1/21/2015 (plh).
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 203 ORDER AFFIRMING 164 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; DENYING 167 Motion ; GRANTING 167 Motion for Extension of Deadlines; AFFIRMING 177 MOTION for APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 1/13/14. (cbn)
April 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER that the 53 MOTION for Extension of Time to File is DENIED. The 54 MOTION for Court Intervention is DENIED. Defendants are ORDERED to file a response re: 55 MOTION to Compel by 4/19/2013. The 56 MOTION for Hearing is DENIED. The 57 MOTION for Order to Show Cause is DENIED. The 60 MOTION to Produce is DENIED. The 61 MOTION to Compel is DENIED. The 62 MOTION for Hearing is DENIED. The 63 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint and 64 MOTION to File Abridged/Amended Petition Excerpts are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III on 4/11/13.(plh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Gusman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marlin Gusman
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Represented By: Timothy R. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Winfield
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Ezeb
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel Gore
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Higgins
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlos Louque
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?