Parker v. Amalgamated Transit Union

Plaintiff: Michael Parker
Defendant: Amalgamated Transit Union
Case Number: 2:2012cv02878
Filed: December 3, 2012
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Orleans
Presiding Judge: Martin L.C. Feldman
Referring Judge: Sally Shushan
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 7, 2013 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER & REASONS granting as unopposed 17 MOTION to deem request for admissions admitted & 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 8/7/2013. (caa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Amalgamated Transit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Parker
Represented By: Sherry Legaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amalgamated Transit Union
Represented By: Christina Leigh Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.