Fisk Electric Company v. Woodrow Wilson Construction Company, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Fisk Electric Company
Defendant: Woodrow Wilson Construction Company, Inc. and Hanover Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv00086
Filed: January 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Kurt D. Engelhardt
Presiding Judge: Sally Shushan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 125 . IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Woodrow Wilson Construction Company, Inc.'s application for an award of attorney's fees and costs (Rec. Doc. 117) is DENIED, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 8/3/2016.(cbs)
June 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 105 . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff Fisk Electric Company's motion for attorneys' fees (Rec. Doc. 88) be and hereby is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and (2) that Plaintiff Fisk Electric Company be and hereby is awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $55,920.00 from Defendant Woodrow Wilson Construction Company, Inc., as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 6/29/2015.(cbs)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court are the parties' submissions relative to the issue of whether a penalty and/or attorney's fees are to be awarded pursuant to the Louisiana Prompt Pay Statute, La. R.S. 9:2784. IT IS ORDERED tha t Plaintiff Fisk Electric Company's motion (Rec. Doc. 75) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Woodrow Wilson Construction Company, Inc.'s motion (Rec. Doc. 74) is DENIED, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/23/2015. (cbs)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER and REASONS granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 1/27/2014. (cbs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fisk Electric Company v. Woodrow Wilson Construction Company, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fisk Electric Company
Represented By: Jessica R. Derenbecker
Represented By: Elizabeth Lapeyre Gordon
Represented By: Lloyd Noble Shields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woodrow Wilson Construction Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hanover Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?