Moffett v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Plaintiff: Mary B. Moffett
Defendant: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Case Number: 2:2013cv00536
Filed: March 21, 2013
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Office: New Orleans Office
County: La Salle
Presiding Judge: Ivan L.R. Lemelle
Referring Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 8, 2014 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND REASONS granting 9 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 10 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 1/7/2014. (ijg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moffett v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary B. Moffett
Represented By: James Frederick Willeford
Represented By: Reagan Levert Toledano
Represented By: Shane Dee Pendley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.