Cockrum v. Carter et al
| Benjamin Louis Cockrum |
| Casey McVea, Bessie Carter and Robert Tanner |
| 2:2013cv05329 |
| August 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Washington |
| Lance M Africk |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 ; ORDERED that Benjamin Louis Cockrum's claims brought under 42 U.S.C.1983 against Warden Robert Tanner, Bessie Carter and Dr. Casey McVea are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failur e to state a claim for which relief can be granted. FURTHER ORDERED that the 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendants, Bessie Carter, Dr. Casey McVea and Warden Robert Tanner is DISMISSED as MOOT. FURTHER ORDERED that the 25 Motion to Enter Evidence into the Record filed by the plaintiff is DISMISSED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 4/25/2014.(blg)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER & REASONS denying 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 16 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cml)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER & REASONS denying 20 Motion to Produce Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cml)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that 10 Motion to Amend/Correct is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cml, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
