Gahagan v. United States Department of Justice et al
| Michael Gahagan |
| United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Executive Office for Immigration Review |
| 2:2013cv05526 |
| August 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER and REASONS granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs. Specifically, the motion is denied relative to attorney's fees, but granted with respect to Plaintiff's request that he be awarded costs in the amount of $506.65, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/20/2017. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 3/11/2016. (kac)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt. (jrc)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER & REASONS granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/23/2014. (mmm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
