Schaffer v. Ogden et al
| Randall M Schaffer |
| Camp Morrison Investigations, LLC, Camp Morrison, H. O. Blackwood, Dennis Donald, Conrad McVea, Brian Begue, C. Barry Ogden, Arthur Hickman and Louisiana State Board of Dentistry |
| 2:2013cv06607 |
| December 9, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Jay C. Zainey |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 32 Motion for Reconsideration; The state law defamation claim against C. Barry Ogden via vicarious liability is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Thus, the previous Order in this case (Rec. Doc. 30) is now vacated to the extent that the Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (Rec. Doc. 29) filed by defendants H.O. Blackwood, Dennis Donald, Conrad McVea, and C. Barry Ogden is now GRANTED as to the dismissal of all claims against these defendants WITH PREJUDICE. The request for costs is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 1/22/15. (jrc)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying without prejudice 29 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 27 Motion to Dismiss; granting 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim/More Definite Statement. Party Brian Begue and Arthur Hickman dismissed. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 11/7/14. (jrc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
