Griffin v. New Orleans City et al
| Trent Steven Griffin, Sr |
| New Orleans City, New Orleans Police Department, Marlin Gusman, Mitch Landrieu, Ronal Serpas, Arlinda Westbrook and Christopher Laine |
| 2:2014cv00559 |
| March 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Orleans |
| Susie Morgan |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER AND REASONS denying 71 Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(B). Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 2/26/2016. (blg)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying 59 Motion for New Trial; denying 60 Motion to reopen the evidence. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 6/5/2015. (blg)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER AND REASONS granting 5 , 25 and 35 Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c); all claims in the matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDER dismissing as moot 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 3/5/2015.(blg)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER AND REASONS: the 50 Motion to Recuse under 28 U.S.C. 455 is GRANTED, and the 51 Motion to Recuse under 28 U.S.C. 144 is DENIED AS MOOT.Judge Susie Morgan recused. Case reassigned to Judge Lance M Africk for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 12/31/2014. (my)(NEF: SM, LMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
