Rettig v. Bruno et al
| Jack Rettig |
| Ronald E. Bruno, Christopher Garcia, Sergio Lopez, Patrick G. Mendoza and Troy J. Williams |
| 2:2014cv00996 |
| April 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Lance M Africk |
| Sally Shushan |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER AND REASONS granting 91 MOTION to Lift Administrative Stay, Sever and Dismiss Defendant Patrick G. Mendoza Without Prejudice, and Amend Judgments. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendant, Patrick G. Mendoza, are SEV ERED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's judgments of 9/30/2014, and 10/15/2014, are VACATED and that an amended judgment shall issue as set forth herein. FURTHER ORDERED that Mendoza's 62 motion pursuant to Rule 60 is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 5/24/2016.(blg)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER AND REASONS granting 63 MOTION for Leave to File Reply; denying 53 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 4/29/2015.(blg)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER AND REASONS denying 30 MOTION to Stay; granting 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with the Court's minute entry of this date addressing attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 9/22/2014.(blg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
