Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Integrated Pro Services, LLC et al
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| Integrated Pro Services, LLC, Gary L. Hess, John M Hess, Ryan L. Hess, Amber M. Hess, Karla S. Hess and Julie C. Hess |
| 2:2014cv01418 |
| June 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Lance M Africk |
| Sally Shushan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
ORDER AND REASONS denying 144 Motion to Lift Stay. Any party may move to reopen the matter within thirty (30) days of a final judgment in the related state court litigation or if additional unforeseen state court trial delay occurs. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 4/23/19. (sbs)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER AND REASONS denying 82 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 8/6/2015. (lag)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that defendants' 77 and 78 motions for leave to file supplemental memoranda are GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Liberty Mutual's 50 and 51 motions for summary judgment are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is hereby STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Any party may file a written motion to re-open the above-captioned matter within 30 days following resolution of the state court litigation. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 6/9/2015.(blg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
