de la Cruz v. Edwards et al
| Hector de la Cruz |
| Daniel Edwards, Lindell Bridges, Edward Stewart, Donnie Spinks, Dwain Tycer, Big Wheel, Inc and Unidentified Parties |
| 2:2014cv01729 |
| July 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Tangipahoa |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Sally Shushan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants Edward Stewart, Donnie Spinks, and Dwain Tycer, 33 , is GRANTED, and that all claims against these defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants Sheriff Daniel Edwards and Deputy Lindell Bridges, 31 , is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that all claims against Sheriff Daniel Edwards, in both his official and personal capacities, and all but the excessive force and assault and battery claims asserted against Deputy Bridges are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Motion is DENIED IN PART to the extent that the excessive force and assault and battery claims asserted against Deputy Bridges have survived summary judgment. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that all claims against unidentified defendants are DISMISSED for want of prosecution, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/3/2015. (cbs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
