Donaldson v. Cain et al
| James Donaldson |
| N. Burl Cain |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2014cv01896 |
| August 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| West Feliciana |
| Susie Morgan |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ORDERED that the amended federal application for habeas corpus relief filed by James Donaldson is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 7/7/2017.(clc)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 . IT IS ORDERED that the petition of James Donaldson for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies, unless Donaldson chooses to amend the petition to dismiss the unexhausted claims for relief and proceed with only the exhausted claims. Donaldson is granted leave of court to file an amended petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus through and including March 22, 2017. If an amended petition is not filed by March 22, Donaldson's petition will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/22/2017.(cg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
