AMTAX Holdings 2001-VV, LLC et al v. Warren Homes, LLC et al
| Amtax Holdings 2001-VV, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 248, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 2001-UU, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 249, LLC and AMTAX Holdings 250, LLC |
| Warren Homes, LLC, Victor R Loraso, Jr, Rene C. Crescionie, Sr., Canary Homes, LLC, Hnasko Holding Company, Inc., Robin Homes, LLC, Smith Square, LLC, Victor Ray Rose, Summit Apartment Management Company, Inc. and Michael R. Peralta |
| Hunt Companies, Inc., Hunt Capital Partners, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 2001-UU, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 248, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 249, LLC, AMTAX Holdings 250, LLC and Amtax Holdings 2001-VV, LLC |
| Warren Homes, LLC, Robin Homes, LLC, Victor R Loraso, Jr, Canary Homes, LLC, Smith Square, LLC, Summit Apartment Management Company, Inc., Michael R. Peralta, Rene C. Crescionie, Sr., Hnasko Holding Company, Inc. and Victor Ray Rose |
| 2:2014cv02652 |
| November 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Kurt D. Engelhardt |
| Sally Shushan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
287
ORDER and REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Loraso's motion for reconsideration (Rec. Doc. 276) is GRANTED relative to the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUD ICE. Given that Plaintiff's claims have been dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, upon Defendant Loraso's motion, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Loraso's remaining breach of contract counterclaim is likewise DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as stated within document, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 11/9/2015. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
263
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court are four motions filed by Plaintiffs, Counterclaim Defendants, and/or Defendant Victor S. Loraso, Jr.. (See Rec. Docs. 84, 85, 173, and 220). IT IS ORDERED that Loraso's motions to dismiss (Rec. Do cs. 173 and 220) are DENIED. IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' and Counterclaim Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED for essentially the reasons set forth in the memoranda submitted in support of their motions (Rec. Docs. 84-2, 85-2, 141, and 142), as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/24/2015. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court are two motions filed by Defendants. Defendants' Motion to Review Magistrate Judge's Denial (Sealed Rec. Doc. 119-8) - IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Review Magistrate Judge' ;s Denial (Sealed Rec. Doc. 119-8) is DENIED such that the Magistrate Judge's Order (Rec. Doc. 110) is AFFIRMED. Defendants' Motion for Contempt, Modification of the Temporary Restraining Order and for Attorneys' Fees (Rec. Doc. 93) - IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/17/2015. (cbs)
|
|
Filing
221
ORDER & REASONS granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as more fully set forth in document. FURTHER ORDERED: Plaintiffs are to promptly submit a short memorandum addressing their standing, if any, relative to the claims against the non-partner defendants and the resulting impact, if any, on this Court's diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiffs' memorandum should also address Defendants' assertion that Plaintiffs' requests for injunctive re lief are irrelevant to the pertinent jurisdictional amount in controversy because the five limited partnerships dissolved by operation of law upon Plaintiffs' removal of the general partners. Following receipt and consideration of Plaintiffs' supplemental memorandum, the Court will rule upon these motions to dismiss. See Rec. Doc. 173, 210, 211-3/220. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 9/16/2015. (mmm)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER and REASONS denying 39 Motion for Contempt of Court, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 2/2/2015. (cbs) Modified on 2/2/2015 to edit document type (cbs).
|
|
Filing
47
ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' motions to quash the subpoenas duces tecum to Little & Associates, LLC, Warren Construction Company, Inc., St. Louis Pointe Development, LLC, and St. Louis Pointe, LLC (Rec. docs. 28 , 29 , 30 and 32 ) are DENIED; and (2) Defendant's motion to quash subpoena duces tecum to Mississippi River Bank (Rec. doc. 31 ) is DISMISSED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sally Shushan. (gec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
