Hillware v. National Football League et al
| Loretta Hillware |
| National Football League, Roger Goodell, Jay Bauman, Tom Benson, Dennis Lauscha, Vicky Neumeyer, Michael Stanfield and Derek Henderson |
| 2:2014cv02964 |
| January 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Mary Ann Vial Lemmon |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 39 Motion for Leave to reconsider for appeal; dismissing as moot 40 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; granting 43 Motion to confirm arbitration award ; denying 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon. (Reference: all)(cbn)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDERED that this case is STAYED AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED RE: 30 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Loretta Hillware - dismissed as moot, 25 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Claims in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Derek Henderson, Michael Stanfield, Vicky Neumeyer, Tom Benson, Dennis Lauscha, 20 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Derek Henderson, Michael Stanfield, Vicky Neumeyer, Tom Benson, Dennis Lauscha - GRANTED; 26 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jay Bauman, Roger Goodell, National Football League - GRANTED. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon.(cbn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
