Matthews v. Cain
| Patrick Matthews |
| N. Burl Cain |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2015cv00430 |
| February 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| West Feliciana |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Sally Shushan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER ADOPTING 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS ORDERED that Patrick Matthews' federal application for habeas corpus relief is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthews' excessive sentence claim is GRANTE D and IT IS ORDERED that he be released from confinement unless the state court resentences him to a constitutional sentence in accordance with this Court's opinion within one hundred twenty (120) days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthews' federal application is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/29/2018.(mmv)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's 16 objections are SUSTAINED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 1 petition of Patrick Warren Matthews for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus is REFERRED to the United States Magistrate Judge to prepare another Report and Recommendation for the Court consistent with this opinion. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 9/1/2017.(mmv) (NEF: Mag. Judge vanMeerveld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
