Abita Springs Town v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
Plaintiff: Abita Springs Town
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, United States Army, Thomas P Bostick and Martin S Mayer
Case Number: 2:2015cv00451
Filed: February 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Orleans
Presiding Judge: Sarah S. Vance
Presiding Judge: Daniel E. Knowles
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05:551
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER & REASONS. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Vacating the U.S. Army Corps' Permit (Rec. Doc. 18 ) is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment Vacating the U.S. Army Corps' Permit (Rec. Doc. 70 ) is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 76 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier. (gec)
September 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Continue Administrative Record Due Date and Further Proceedings (Rec. Doc. 59) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The deadline for filing the administrative record is extended by thir ty days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants file the administrative record on or before October 20, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Vacating the U.S. Army Corps' Permit (Rec. Doc. 18) is reset for hearing on Wednesday, December 2, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiff is ordered to file any supplement to its motion on or before November 4, 2015. Defendants are ordered to file any response to Plaintiff's motion on or before November 16, 2015. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 9/16/15.(sek)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abita Springs Town v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abita Springs Town
Represented By: Jeffery E. Friedman
Represented By: Lisa Lavie Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Army
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas P Bostick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin S Mayer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?