Jason v. LeBlanc et al
| Clarence Joseph Jason |
| James LeBlanc, Robert Tanner, Shane Ladner, Bradley Pierce and Unidentified Party |
| 2:2015cv00607 |
| February 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| East Feliciana |
| Susie Morgan |
| Michael North |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' 92 motion for summary judgment with respect to Defendants Pierce, Ladner, and Tanner is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment with respect to Defendant LeBlanc is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan. (bwn)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER AND REASONS: ORDERED that the Defendants' 51 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Basis on Qualified Immunity is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and may be refiled after the completion of the limited discovery ordered herein. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 9/21/2017. (clc)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 . IT IS ORDERED that Defendants motion is granted and that Plaintiffs claims against the Defendants in their official capacity are dismissed without prejudice for want of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for declaratory relief is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Judge Susie Morgan.(bwn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
