Esteve v. Cain et al
| Vernon Esteve |
| N. Burl Cain |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2015cv00787 |
| March 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| West Feliciana |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's 16 objections are SUSTAINED to the extent that he objects to the Magistrate Judge's determination that Petitioner is procedurally barred from raising his claim that there was insuf ficient evidence to support his conviction, and Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED in all other respects; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court REJECTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to the extent it recommends that the Court find that Petitioner is procedurally barred from raising his claim that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction, and ADOPTS the 15 Report and Recommendation in all other respects; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Vernon Esteve's petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 9/12/2017.(mmv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
