Wright's Well Control Services, LLC v. Oceaneering International, Inc. et al
| Wright's Well Control Services, LLC |
| Oceaneering International, Inc. and Christopher Mancini |
| 2:2015cv01720 |
| May 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Calcasieu |
| Sarah S. Vance |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
428
ORDER AND REASONS granting 381 Motion for Summary Judgment, as set forth in document. Oceaneering's counterclaims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court further DENIES Oceaneering's request to dismiss WWCS's breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims as untimely. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/20/2018. (jls)
|
|
Filing
427
ORDER AND REASONS denying 374 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/19/2018. (clc)
|
|
Filing
351
ORDER AND REASONS denying 327 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/9/2018. (cg)
|
|
Filing
350
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 266 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as stated herein. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/5/2018. (cg)
|
|
Filing
343
ORDER AND REASONS regarding 273 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 289 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and 326 Motion for Reconsideration. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Oceaneering's motion for summary judgment on W WCS's patent infringement claim, and DENIES WWCS's motion for reconsideration and its cross-motion for summary judgment. WWCS's claim for infringement of the '725 Patent is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 1/22/2018. (cg)
|
|
Filing
340
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 264 Motion for reconsideration or clarification of the Court's August 23, 2017 order. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 12/28/2017. (blg)
|
|
Filing
318
ORDER AND REASONS granting 224 and 225 Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motions to dismiss defendants' counterclaims for attorney's fees are GRANTED. Defendants' counterclaims for attorney's fees are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 11/20/2017. (cg)
|
|
Filing
260
ORDER AND REASONS granting 210 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. WWCS's claim for infringement of the '185 Patent is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 8/28/2017. (cg)
|
|
Filing
258
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 172 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 182 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. WWCS's claims for business disparagement, common law misappropriation, unfair competition, breach of confidential relationship, Texas common law misappropriation of trade secrets, and Louisiana misappropriation of trade secrets are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 8/23/2017. (cg)
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER AND REASONS granting 152 Motion to Continue trial. Thus, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) the Court will hold a conference with the parties on May 31, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. to enter a new scheduling order with specific patent-related deadlines Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 5/4/2017. (cg) Modified on 5/4/2017 (cg).
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER granting 151 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's claims against Christopher Mancini with prejudice; 158 Motion for Summary Judgment and 170 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent plaintiff seeks to reserve any rights to proceed against any other parties and/or solidary obligors in this action, that request is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/10/2017. (cg)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER & REASONS granting 121 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's patent claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with leave to amend within 14 days of this order. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/13/2017. (mmm)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER AND REASONS denying 55 Motion to Bifurcate. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/25/16. (jjs)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER AND REASONS - the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendants' motion 32 to dismiss. Plaintiff's breach of contract claim is DISMISSED with prejudice to the extent that it rests on use of information in the patent applicatio ns or on conduct that occurred after December 11, 2012. Plaintiff's trade secret misappropriation claim under the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's claim for fraudulent inducement is DISMISSED without prejudice and with leave to amend within twenty-one (21) days of this order. The Court declines to dismiss plaintiff's other claims.. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 11/16/15.(jjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
