Smith v. Kliebert et al
Thomas J. Smith |
Kathy Kliebert, Department of Health and Hospitals State of Louisiana, South Central Louisiana Human Service Authority - Developmental Disabilities, Lafourche Arc and Easter Seals of Louisiana, Inc. |
2:2015cv01775 |
May 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Lafourche |
Martin L.C. Feldman |
Joseph C. Wilkinson |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that Easter Seals' Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 12 ); DHH, SCLHSA, and Kliebert's Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 22 ); and Lafourche ARC's Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 37 ) are GRANTED. The above-captioned action is DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claim seeking review of the DHH's decision to terminate his benefits under the NOW program, over which this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's federa l allegations, which do not state a plausible claim upon which relief can be granted, are DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency Preliminary Injunction (Rec. Doc. 9 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition (Rec. Doc. 38 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/12/15. (sek) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.