Namer v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
| Robert Namer |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company, AIG Property Casualty Company, Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. and Unidentified Parties |
| 2:2015cv03263 |
| August 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Ivan L.R. Lemelle |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER AND REASONS granting 54 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. FURTHER ORDERED that all of Namer's claims against AIIC in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 4/12/2016.(blg)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER AND REASONS denying 44 MOTION Rule 60 Relief from Judgment. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 4/4/2016.(blg)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER AND REASONS denying 34 Joint MOTION Final Judgment filed by AIG Property Casualty Company, Scottsdale Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 2/29/2016.(blg)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER AND REASONS granting 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company, 18 MOTION to Dismiss filed by AIG Property Casualty Company; AIG Property Casualty Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company terminated. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 11/19/2015.(blg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
