Cosper v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
Jon Cosper |
DraftKings, Inc. and FanDuel, Inc. |
2:2015cv06720 |
December 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Jefferson |
Daniel E Knowles |
Sarah S Vance |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. § 1962 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Receipt of Case Transferred to District of Massachusetts (mmm) |
Filing 20 Order of MDL Transfer to District of Massachusetts. MDL case number is 2677. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(mmm) |
Filing 19 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 2677. (mmm) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to FanDuel, Inc. answer due 3/4/2016.. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/2/16. (jjs) |
Filing 17 EXPARTE/CONSENT Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by FanDuel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schmeeckle, Seth) |
Filing 16 ORDER finding as moot #14 Motion to Expedite. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/1/16. (jjs) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to DraftKings, Inc.. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/1/16. (jjs) |
Filing 14 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Expedite by DraftKings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support)(Lopinto, Joseph) |
Filing 13 EXPARTE/CONSENT Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by DraftKings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lopinto, Joseph) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to FanDuel, Inc. answer due 2/3/2016.. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 1/12/16. (jjs) |
Filing 11 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by FanDuel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schmeeckle, Seth) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 1/11/16. (jjs) |
Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by DraftKings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lopinto, Joseph) |
Filing 8 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by FanDuel, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent FanDuel, Inc., Corporate Parent FanDuel Limited for FanDuel, Inc. (Schmeeckle, Seth) |
Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Stay Pending JPML Determination by DraftKings, Inc., FanDuel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, B, C, D and E, #3 Proposed Order)Attorney Seth Andrew Schmeeckle added to party FanDuel, Inc.(pty:dft).(Schmeeckle, Seth) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Collateral Proceedings by FanDuel, Inc. . (Schmeeckle, Seth) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DraftKings, Inc., FanDuel, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(clc) |
Filing 4 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Dugan, James) |
Filing 3 Rico Standing Order. by Clerk on 12/11/15.(jjs) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles, III. (jeg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against DraftKings, Inc., FanDuel, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 053L-5146286) filed by Jon Cosper. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney James R. Dugan, II added to party Jon Cosper(pty:pla).(Dugan, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/14/2015: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mmm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.