Romain et al v. Sonnier
Lisa Romain, Stacey Gibson, Joanika Davis, Schevelli Robertson, Jericho Macklin, Dameion Williams and Brian Trinchard |
Suzy Sonnier |
2:2015cv06942 |
December 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Orleans |
Kurt D. Engelhardt |
Sally Shushan |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER AND REASONS granting 44 Motion for Attorney Fees, but with a slight reduction in the quantum of fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall remit payment to Plaintiffs in the amount of $256,521.72, representing $252,077.00 in attorneys' fees and $4,444.72 in litigation costs. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/7/2019. (cg) |
Filing 42 ORDER AND REASONS granting 13 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Lisa Romain. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days from the issuance of this order, Plaintiffs shall submit briefing regarding the quantum of fees to which they are entitled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file any response or opposition to Plaintiffs' position within seven (7) days of Plaintiffs' submission. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 10/2/2019.(cg) |
Filing 23 ORDER and REASONS denying 13 Motion for Attorney Fees, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 7/18/216. (cbs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.