Carlisle v. Normand, et al
| Taylor Carlisle |
| Newell Normand |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2016cv00838 |
| January 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Susie Morgan |
| Joseph C. Wilkinson |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Rec. Doc. 69 - IT IS ORDERED that Taylor Carlisle's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28:2241 is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court GRANTS Petitioner a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 10/22/2020.(sa)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court has considered the petition, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate Judge� 39;s Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendations with respect to the recommendation to dismiss the petition as moot is adopted. Accordingly, the Petitioner's motion for evidentiary hearing is denied. IT IS ORDERED that the petition of Taylor Carlisle for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as moot. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 21st day of February, 2017. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/21/2017.(cg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
