Webster v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
| Nathan J. Webster |
| Louisiana Department of Corrections, Robert C Tanner, Darryl Mizell, Walter P Reed, Lewis V. Murray, St. Tammany Parish, Washington Parish, James LeBlanc, Mike Todd, District Attorney's Office and M E Todd |
| 2:2016cv00847 |
| January 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Washington |
| Martin L.C. Feldman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 . ORDERED that plaintiff's false arrest claims against all defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining claims against the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corr ections are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining official-capacity claims against James LeBlanc, Robert C. Tanner, Mike Todd, and Darryl Mizell for monetary damages also are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that all r emaining individual-capacity claims against Walter P. Reed and Lewis V. Murray for monetary damages also are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that any remaining claims against any remaining defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 3/16/2016. (NEF: MAG-3)(caa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
