SCF Waxler Marine, LLC v. Aris T M/V
SCF Waxler Marine, LLC |
Aris T M/V |
Valero Refining - New Orleans, LLC, Motiva Enterprises LLC and Shell Chemical LP |
Marmaras Navigation Limited, Aris T M/V, Unidentified Party and Aris T Ene |
2:2016cv00902 |
February 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Out of State |
Jay C. Zainey |
Joseph C. Wilkinson |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 355 ORDER AND REASONS - The Motions in Limine (Rec. Docs. 324 and 325 ) are GRANTED; and the Motion in Limine (Rec. Doc. 326 ) is GRANTED as to generally excluding the materials, and DENIED as to their use for the limited purposes cited in Crosby Tugs, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 4/19/2019. (Reference: All Cases)(sa) |
Filing 176 ORDER AND REASONS denying 160 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 9/5/2017. (Reference: 16-1614)(caa) |
Filing 154 ORDER AND REASONS. The Court finds that the drafts of the NOBRA Pilot Incident Report at issue here are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the disclosure of the final draft of the Report does not result in a waiver of the privilege. Accordingly, the Motion to Compel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (Reference: ALL CASES)(gec) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.