Bernard v. Scott Litigation Group

Bernard v. Scott Litigation Group

Plaintiff:	Donald J. Bernard
Defendant:	Scott Litigation Group
Case Number:	2:2016cv01314
Filed:	February 16, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office:	New Orleans Office
County:	Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Susie Morgan
Presiding Judge:	Sally Shushan
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2017	Filing 50 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for breach of contract is DENIED. I T IS ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for breach of fiduciary duty is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's claim for breach of fiduciary duty is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS ORD ERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for detrimental reliance is DENIED. IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 3/2/2017. (cg)
January 12, 2017	Filing 38 ORDER AND REASONS denying 23 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 1/12/2017. (cg)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2017

Filing 50 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for breach of contract is DENIED. I T IS ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for breach of fiduciary duty is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's claim for breach of fiduciary duty is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS ORD ERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for detrimental reliance is DENIED. IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to Plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 3/2/2017. (cg)

January 12, 2017

Filing 38 ORDER AND REASONS denying 23 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 1/12/2017. (cg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bernard v. Scott Litigation Group
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald J. Bernard
Represented By:	John M. Robin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Litigation Group
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?