Aker Solutions Inc. v. Shamrock Energy Solutions, LLC et al

Plaintiff: Aker Solutions Inc.
Defendant: Shamrock Energy Solutions, LLC and Samurai International Petroleum, LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv02560
Filed: March 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Jane Triche Milazzo
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 Filing 196 ORDER granting 182 Motion to Fix Attorney Fees. Plaintiffs are awarded reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses in the amount of $6,000.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Shamrock shall satisfy its obligation toDefendants no later than twenty-one (21) days from the issuance of this Order. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on January 28, 2021. (mp)
December 30, 2019 Filing 148 ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the Shamrock Defendants' motion for a new trial 138 is DENIED, but the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 134 are hereby amended, as set forth in document. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Aker's motion for attorney's fees 137 is GRANTED, and Aker is awarded attorney's fees in the total amount of $474,848.50. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 12/30/2019. (am)
October 8, 2019 Filing 134 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: As stated herein, IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Aker and against SIPCO and Shamrock Management awarding Aker $1,780,144.19, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, attorney's fee s, and court costs, for which SIPCO and Shamrock Management are jointly and solidarily liable. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Trahan dismissing all of Aker's claims against him. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 10/08/2019.(am)
August 30, 2016 Filing 40 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part Shamrock's 12 , 36 Motions to Dismiss; denying Trahan's 37 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. All claims other than Aker's alter ego claims against Shamrock survive. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo. (ecm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aker Solutions Inc. v. Shamrock Energy Solutions, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aker Solutions Inc.
Represented By: David S. Bland
Represented By: Brian J. Comarda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shamrock Energy Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Thomas J. Cortazzo
Represented By: Larry E. Mobley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samurai International Petroleum, LLC
Represented By: David J. Norman, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?