Jolie Design & Decor, Inc. et al v. Websters Chalk Paint Powder, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Jolie Design & Decor, Inc. and Annie Sloan Interiors, Ltd.
Defendant: Websters Chalk Paint Powder, LLC, Toy Nicole Goodwin, Heather Dohn Miller and Lorraine C Beckman
Case Number: 2:2016cv02929
Filed: April 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Kurt D. Engelhardt
Presiding Judge: Michael North
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER and REASONS - Presently before the Court are motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim 11 & 16 , filed by Defendants Toy Nicole Goodwin, Lorraine C. Beckman, and Heather Dohn Miller (collectively, "Individual Defendants"), an d asserting substantially similar arguments. IT IS ORDERED that the Individual Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Lanham Act claims against the Individual Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 7/29/2016. (cbs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jolie Design & Decor, Inc. et al v. Websters Chalk Paint Powder, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jolie Design & Decor, Inc.
Represented By: Raymond Gerard Areaux
Represented By: Ian Charles Barras
Represented By: Joseph Matthew Miller, III
Represented By: Theodore S. Owers, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annie Sloan Interiors, Ltd.
Represented By: Raymond Gerard Areaux
Represented By: Ian Charles Barras
Represented By: Joseph Matthew Miller, III
Represented By: Theodore S. Owers, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Websters Chalk Paint Powder, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toy Nicole Goodwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heather Dohn Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lorraine C Beckman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?