Matthews v. Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Eugene Matthews, II
Defendant: Daniel Edwards, Lt. Finn, Deputy Eady, Deputy Sospheas and Tangipahoa Parish
Case Number: 2:2016cv02938
Filed: April 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: St Tammany
Presiding Judge: Carl Barbier
Presiding Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 78) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's claims asserted against Corr ectHealth and Dr. Smith under the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act are DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiffs claims against Dr. Smith arising under federal law are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against Dr. Smith is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/8/2019. (cg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Eugene Matthews, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Edwards
Represented By: Ronald Shane Bryant
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Represented By: Timothy R. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lt. Finn
Represented By: Ronald Shane Bryant
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Represented By: Timothy R. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Eady
Represented By: Ronald Shane Bryant
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Represented By: Timothy R. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deputy Sospheas
Represented By: Ronald Shane Bryant
Represented By: Freeman Rudolph Matthews
Represented By: Timothy R. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tangipahoa Parish
Represented By: Glen Ray Galbraith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?