Leone v. General Motors LLC, et al
| Tanya Leone |
| General Motors LLC and Avis Budget Car Rental, L.L.C. |
| 2:2016cv06830 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Ivan L.R. Lemelle |
| Daniel E. Knowles |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER AND REASONS GRANTING 67 Motion Pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(a) and/or Alternatively Rule 59(e) to Correct and/or Alter or Amend the Final Judgment Issued on September 5, 2017. A motion for reconsideration of this Order, based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, if any, must be filed within ten (10) days of this Order, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 10/18/2017. (jls)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 60 , 62 , 63 , and 64 motions are GRANTED AS UNOPPOSED, it appearing to the Court that the motions have merit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of Plaintiffs claims in the above-captioned matter are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 8/23/2017.(jls)
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION: IT IS ORDERED that the 28 motion is DENIED. The jury trial remains scheduled for October 16, 2017. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 7/21/2017. (mmv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
