Essex Crane Rental Corp v. DB CROSSMAR 14, et al
| Essex Crane Rental Corp |
| DB Crossmar 14, Manitowoc 4100W-I 230 Ton Lift Crane and Cross Group Inc. |
| 2:2016cv08146 |
| June 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Out of State |
| Ivan L.R. Lemelle |
| Sally Shushan |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 77 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as set forth in document.Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 3/13/2017. (mmv)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 82 motion for an extension is DENIED as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 3/13/2017. (mmv)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER AND REASONS GRANTING 69 Motion to Confirm United States Marshal's Sale and to Cancel All Mortgages, Liens, Encumbrances, and Pre-Existing Claims against the D/B CROSSMAR 14 as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 11/9/2016. (mmv) (3CC: USM)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER AND REASONS granting 26 Motion for Order Noting Default; granting 27 Motion to Set Sale of Seized Vessel; dismissing as moot 46 Motion to Continue Sale; granting 49 Motion to Continue Requested Sale Date of Seized Vessel From October 17, 2016 to October 24, 2016. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 10/6/2016. (3ccUSM, NEF: Financial) (lag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
