Progressive Waste Solutions of LA, Inc. v. St.Bernard Parish Government
Plaintiff: Progressive Waste Solutions of LA, Inc.
Defendant: St. Bernard Parish Government
Intervenor: Pelican Waste and Debris, LLC
Counter_claimant: St. Bernard Parish Government
Counter_defendant: Progressive Waste Solutions of LA, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv08669
Filed: June 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: St Bernard
Presiding Judge: Eldon E. Fallon
Presiding Judge: Michael North
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 167 ORDER & REASONS that PWS's 125 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 12/21/2017. (cms)
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDERED that the SDT Defendants' 101 106 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. They are GRANTED as they relate to PWSs claim that Section 9.7 of the Purchase Agreement includes a duty to indemnify. They are DENIED as th ey relates to PWSs claims that the SDT Defendants owe indemnification because the counterclaims arise from a misrepresentation or omission in the Purchase Agreement. FURTHER ORDERED that PWS's 109 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties contact the case manager, Dean Oser, to set a scheduling conference with the Court. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 4/11/2017. (Reference: 16-8669, 16-15830)(cms)
August 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER & REASONS that Pelican's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment Finding Plaintiff's Contract Invalid is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pelican's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Validity of Pelican's Contract and the Right of St. Bernard Parish Government to Pay It is DENIED since the Pelican contract is invalid. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PWS' 46 Motion for Summary Judgment on 2013 Time Contract is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PWS' 48 Mot ion for Summary Judgment on Intervenor's Contract is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that St. Bernard's 57 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Invalidity of the PWS Contract is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that St. Bernard's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Invalidity of the Pelican Contract is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PWS' 63 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in Counterclaim is GRANTED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as PWS s eeks to dismiss St. Bernard's prayers for relief stemming from the invalidity of the second SDT contract. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PWS' 65 Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaim is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PWS' 61 Motion to Strike Certain of Defendant's Witnesses, R. 61, is DENIED, reserving PWS the right to re-urge if necessary. The Court has continued the case, so PWS' principal objections are moot. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 8/9/16. (dno)
June 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER & REASONS that the Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall attend a telephone status conference on Monday, June 27, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 6/23/16. (dno)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Progressive Waste Solutions of LA, Inc. v. St.Bernard Parish Government
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Progressive Waste Solutions of LA, Inc.
Represented By: Jacob Kenneth Best
Represented By: Guice Anthony Giambrone, III
Represented By: Christopher Michael Hatcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Bernard Parish Government
Represented By: David C. Jarrell
Represented By: Charles Raymond Ward, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: Pelican Waste and Debris, LLC
Represented By: Thomas J. Cortazzo
Represented By: Larry E. Mobley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: St. Bernard Parish Government
Represented By: David C. Jarrell
Represented By: Charles Raymond Ward, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Progressive Waste Solutions of LA, Inc.
Represented By: Jacob Kenneth Best
Represented By: Guice Anthony Giambrone, III
Represented By: Christopher Michael Hatcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?