Gremillion v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
Scott Gremillion |
Cox Communications, Inc. and Grayco Communications, L.P. |
2:2016cv09849 |
June 13, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Orleans |
Ivan L.R. Lemelle |
Michael North |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 207 ORDER AND REASONS denying 186 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 6/28/2018. (ajn) |
Filing 199 ORDER AND REASONS granting 193 Motion to Compel. Plaintiffs' request for Oral Argument is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 5/15/2018. (ajn) |
Filing 185 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part 169 Motion to Compel, as set forth in document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 3/7/2018. (jls) |
Filing 166 ORDER AND REASONS: GRANTING in part 160 Motion to Compel. Grayco shall produce the Texas Settlement to the Plaintiff in accordance with the instructions in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 12/28/2017. (ajn) |
Filing 90 ORDERED that 83 Motion for Conditional Certification as a Collective Action is GRANTED in part. This Court hereby conditionally certifies this matter as a collective action as to all individuals who worked as a cable technician providing cab le repair and installation services for Grayco Communications, L.P., in Louisiana at any time since March 24, 2014 and were paid through a point-based system. It is FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall meet and confer regarding the n otice and consent forms that will be distributed to class members as stated within document. It is FURTHER ORDERED that in the event the parties agree on the proposed notice and consent forms, the parties shall file such forms with the Court no l ater than July 13, 2017. If the parties are unable to agree on the language of the notice and consent forms, the parties shall file with the Court (1) their proposed notice and consent forms and (2) their objections to same, with supporting author ity, no later than July 20, 2017. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Grayco provide all known names, addresses, and e-mail addresses for all class members in Grayco's possession in a usable electronic format no later than thirty days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (gec) |
Filing 81 ORDER AND REASONS. It is ORDERED that the 80 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (gec) |
Filing 79 ORDER AND REASONS. It is ORDERED that Cox Communications Louisiana LLC's 70 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Cox is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (gec) |
Filing 41 ORDER AND REASONS granting in part, denying in part 28 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Plaintiff's FLSA claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint by 11/8/2016. Should plaintiff amend the complaint, any renewed motion to dismiss by Cox is due by 11/16/2016. Cox's brief shall not exceed five pages. Plaintiff's opposition to any motion to dismiss is due by 11/23/2016. Plaintiff's brief shall not exceed five pages. Further, plaintiff's claims under La. Rev. Stat. 23:631 and 23:632 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of the motion to dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 11/1/2016.(blg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.