Jenkins v. Clauss et al
| Ronji Jenkins |
| Matthew R. Clauss, Donald Zanotelli and Gabirel Fuacetta |
| 2:2016cv14584 |
| September 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| Jefferson |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ronji Jenkins's 1983 claims against Matthew R. Clauss for pursuing the prosecution of Jenkins are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and otherwise for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted under 28 U.S.C. 1915, 1915A, and 42 U.S.C. 1997e. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ronji Jenkins's 1983 claims for wrongful arrest by the defendants, Donald Zanotelli, Gabriel Fuacetta, and Matthew R. Clauss are STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED for statistical purposes until such time as Jenkins's state criminal charges have ended. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jenkins must move to reopen the matter within thirty(30) days following resolution of his state felony criminal charges, including any direct appeal or immediate supervisory review, and include notification to the Court in writing whether Jenkins was convicted or acquitted. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 12/22/2016.(mmv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
