Admiral Bulker M/V v. United Bulk Terminals Davant LLC et al
Admiral Bulker M/V |
United Bulk Terminals Davant LLC, Camellia Maritime, Bernhard Schulte Singapore, Kokuka Glorious and Kokuka Sangyo Co. Ltd. |
2:2016cv16215 |
November 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Out of Country |
Jane Triche Milazzo |
Karen Wells Roby |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 182 ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that Ingram's Motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 147 ) is GRANTED, and all claims brought against Ingram by the Vessel and Cargo Interests (Rec. Doc. 1 - Case No. 16-17745; Rec. Doc. 57 - Case No. 16-16215; and Rec. Doc. 109 - Case No. 16-16215) are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Kokuka Glorious Interests' Motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 148 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Admiral Bulker Interests' Motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 149 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 6/19/2019. (Reference: All Cases)(sa) |
Filing 61 ORDER AND REASONS granting 16 , 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying M/V Admiral Bulker's 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The claims against Camellia Maritime, S.A. and United Bulk Terminals Davant, LLC are dismissed with prejudice in 16-16215. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo. (Reference: All Cases)(ecm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.