KFC Corporation v. Iron Horse of Metairie Road, LLC et al
Plaintiff: KFC Corporation
Defendant: Iron Horse of Metairie Road, LLC and Iron Rooster, LLC
Case Number: 2:2016cv16791
Filed: December 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Office: New Orleans Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Kurt D. Engelhardt
Presiding Judge: Michael North
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 183 ORDER AND REASONS: The Court DENIES defendants' 166 motion to enforce settlement and 171 motion for additional discovery. The Court GRANTS defendants' 171 Rule 39(b) motion for a trial by jury. A scheduling conference will be held by telephone on 3/28/2019 at 10:45 a.m. for the purpose of scheduling a jury trial, as well as a pretrial conference. The Court will initiate the telephone conference call, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 3/12/2019.(jls)
July 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER AND REASONS - For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS PSI's motion to transfer for forum non conveniens. Iron Rooster's third-party complaint is transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. KFC Corporation's motion to sever and try Iron Rooster's third-party complaint separately, PSI's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and PSI's motion for summary judgment are all DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/31/2018. (cg)
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 140 ORDER AND REASONS denying 118 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 7/16/2018. (ajn)
May 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER AND REASONS: The Court GRANTS IN PART plaintiff's 65 motion for summary judgment. Defendants' counterclaim for detrimental reliance is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court DENIES summary judgment as to defendants' counterclaim for abuse of rights as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 5/30/2018. (mmv)
May 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER and REASONS denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that KFC Corporation's Motion is DENIED without prejudice. At present, the Court finds that, on the showing made, there remain numerous issues of material fact that are better decided by the trier of fact at trial on the merits, as set forth herein. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/8/2018. (sa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KFC Corporation v. Iron Horse of Metairie Road, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KFC Corporation
Represented By: Brodie G. Glenn
Represented By: Stephen P. Schott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Iron Horse of Metairie Road, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Iron Rooster, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?