Dumas v. St. Tammany Parish Fire District No. 3 et al
| James Dumas |
| St. Tammany Parish Fire District No. 3, Patrick Sicard and Scott Lober |
| 2:2017cv01025 |
| February 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| New Orleans Office |
| St Tammany |
| Carl Barbier |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER & REASONS. It is ORDERED that Defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's First Amendment freedom of association and freedom of speech retaliation claims against Defendant Lober are DISMISSE D WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's First Amendment freedom of speech retaliation claim, as it relates to May 2016 union letter, against Defendant Sicard is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's First Amendment freedom of speech retaliation clai m, as it relates to communication with Rick Franzo and Cindy Rester, against Defendant Sicard is not dismissed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the entry of this order as state d within document. Defendants may then file a responsive pleading within 10 days of Plaintiff's amended complaint. It is FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent that Plaintiff sought monetary damages pursuant to Louisiana Revised Statute 23:822, that claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier. (gec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
