Idel v. Leblanc et al
Kenneth Idel |
James M. LeBlanc, Sandy McCain, Keith Bickham, Beverly Kelly, Jonathan Tynes, Sergeant Pope, Theresa Knight, Casey McVea and Unidentified Parties |
2:2017cv01553 |
February 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
New Orleans Office |
Orleans |
Nannette Jolivette Brown |
Karen Wells Roby |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED and that the plaintiff's counsel is awarded reasonable attorney's fees in the amount of $1,240.75. FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's counsel shall satisfy the obligation to plaintiff's counsel no later than fourteen (14) days from the signing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (mp) |
Filing 99 ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Kenneth Idel's 60 Motion to Strike Affidavit and Documents is converted to objections to the Court's consideration of the evidence and the objections are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Richard Pope's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 4/29/2019. (mmv) |
Filing 43 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 33 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiff's official capacity claims against all Defendants are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 33 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants LeBlanc, McCain, Bickham, Kelly, Tynes, Knight, Singh, Young, and McVea are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 33 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED IN PART as to Plaintiff's Section 1983 individual claims against Defendant Pope. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' prior 27 Motion to Dismiss, is DENIED AS MOOT, as Plaintiff subsequently filed an Amended Complaint and Defendants filed a new motion to dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/16/2018. (mmv) |
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 37 . Ordered that the Motion to Dismiss 9 ] is DISMISSED AS MOOT and without prejudice to the review of the defendants other pending Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 1/22/2018.(caa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.